title
Best Web Hosting For Wordpress 2021 🔥90 DAY BEST WORDPRESS HOSTING🔥

description
Get The Best Web Hosting For Wordpress With This Best Wordpress Hosting Test! I FULLY Test Every Web Hosting Company SPEED and DOWNTIME For 90 Days. These Were My Results! TimeStamps: 0:00 Intro 00:02:25 - Web Hosting Companies To Avoid 00:04:43 - Average Web Hosting Companies 00:07:59 - Fast Web Hosting Companies Here Are The Companies That Performed The BEST 1.Hostinger: https://www.darrelwilson.com/hostinger (link+code darrel gives you 10% off ANY plan) 2.Namehero:https://www.darrelwilson.com/namehero (this link gives you 70% off) 3.Liquidweb: https://www.darrelwilson.com/liquidweb (code darrel35 gives you 35% OFF) 4. Wp-Engine: https://www.darrelwilson.com/wp-engine (link gives you 25% OFF ALL Plans) 5. KnownHost: https://www.darrelwilson.com/knownhost  (For KnownHost, I have a few selected discounts: DARREL - Provides 10% off: Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Managed & Dedicated ServersDARREL4030 - Provides 40% off the Initial purchase, and 30% discount for life.DARREL60 - Provides 60% any WordPress hosting package) 6.Siteground: http://www.darrelwilson.com/siteground70 7.WPX Hosting: https://www.darrelwilson.com/wpx 8.A2: https://www.darrelwilson.com/a2hostinglink 9.CloudWays: https://www.darrelwilson.com/cloudways 10.Kinsta: https://www.darrelwilson.com/kinsta These next companies performed on AVERAGE, if you want to try them out go for it! (they are still good) 1. GreenGeeks: https://www.darrelwilson.com/greengeeks 2. FastComet: https://www.darrelwilson.com/fastcoment 3. Chemicloud: https://www.darrelwilson.com/chemicloud 4. GetFlywheel: https://www.darrelwilson.com/getflywheel UPDATE :Web hosts that i tested that werent included in the video (I will be creating a blog post with screeenshots for all of the host) DreamHost (BELOW AVERAGE ) 4.56 Page Speed and 56 minutes of Downtime InterServer (AVERAGE) 2.90 Page Speed and 45 Minutes Of Downtime In this video, i fully test ALL web hosting providers to bring you the best web hosting for your wordpress website! Hopefully by now you have enough information on what you need for switching to some of the best web hosting companies. Again i wish you the best and good luck with your new web hosting company! If you are using the hosts that suck, make sure to switch. cheap and best web hosting best web hosting for wordpress. This is the best web hosting video for the best web hosting for wordpress Checkout my other Multilingual Wordpress Tutorial Youtube Channels! Spanish Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1Sm53FofDOVA5T0pzyebEA Arabic Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDxCp7gMbzmNIjUqOCu1xcg/videos Hindi Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjTje7OJghnjEJ8d4llefQw Portuguese Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOs-QXBdlmT0YL3I-bnyeug French Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLEH_xAh0VxCTSq1AQBYPsg German Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTkmZD2BCJpedWe4Hb5QVLw Want more help and news on Wordpress? Feel free to visit my website at https://www.darrelwilson.com

detail
{'title': 'Best Web Hosting For Wordpress 2021 🔥90 DAY BEST WORDPRESS HOSTING🔥', 'heatmap': [], 'summary': "Provides a detailed analysis of web hosting performance, including tests on 22 companies, offering exclusive discounts. it highlights top companies' speed, downtime, and pricing, recommending them based on performance data and suitability for different user levels.", 'chapters': [{'end': 71.604, 'segs': [{'end': 71.604, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 16.175, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 17.496, 'text': 'Welcome, welcome party people.', 'start': 16.175, 'duration': 1.321}, {'end': 20.358, 'text': 'Come on in and take a seat because the results are in.', 'start': 17.576, 'duration': 2.782}, {'end': 28.303, 'text': "My name is Zero Wilson and today in this video, I'll be showing you who is the fastest web hosting and also who is the slowest.", 'start': 20.738, 'duration': 7.565}, {'end': 32.706, 'text': 'I recorded the performance of 22 different web hosting companies for 90 days.', 'start': 28.864, 'duration': 3.842}, {'end': 37.709, 'text': "And today in this video, I'm gonna show you who had the fastest page speed and also the best uptime.", 'start': 32.826, 'duration': 4.883}, {'end': 42.713, 'text': "I'll be breaking this video down into three sections companies I don't recommend,", 'start': 38.65, 'duration': 4.063}, {'end': 47.316, 'text': 'companies that performed on average and companies that are very fast, and I would recommend.', 'start': 42.713, 'duration': 4.603}, {'end': 52.499, 'text': "I have timestamps in the description of this video to each category, so if you're in a hurry,", 'start': 47.836, 'duration': 4.663}, {'end': 55.321, 'text': 'feel free to jump to the best web hosting companies at any time.', 'start': 52.499, 'duration': 2.822}, {'end': 62.062, 'text': "So if you've seen other web posting companies and you're not sure if they're fast or reliable, then in this video, we are going to find out.", 'start': 56.101, 'duration': 5.961}, {'end': 68.103, 'text': 'Plus, I have exclusive discounts for some of these web posting companies that you will not find anywhere else on the Internet.', 'start': 62.342, 'duration': 5.761}, {'end': 69.103, 'text': "Now, let's be honest.", 'start': 68.423, 'duration': 0.68}, {'end': 69.983, 'text': "We've all been screwed.", 'start': 69.143, 'duration': 0.84}, {'end': 71.004, 'text': "We've all bought web posting.", 'start': 70.023, 'duration': 0.981}, {'end': 71.604, 'text': 'That sucks.', 'start': 71.044, 'duration': 0.56}], 'summary': "Zero wilson compares 22 web hosting companies' performance over 90 days, revealing the fastest and most reliable ones.", 'duration': 55.429, 'max_score': 16.175, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik16175.jpg'}], 'start': 16.175, 'title': 'Web hosting performance', 'summary': 'Reveals the performance of 22 web hosting companies, categorizing them into not recommended, average performing, and highly recommended based on 90-day tests, with exclusive discounts offered.', 'chapters': [{'end': 71.604, 'start': 16.175, 'title': 'Fastest vs slowest web hosting', 'summary': 'Reveals the fastest and slowest web hosting companies based on 90-day performance tests of 22 companies, categorizing them into not recommended, average performing, and highly recommended, with exclusive discounts offered.', 'duration': 55.429, 'highlights': ['Zero Wilson recorded and analyzed the performance of 22 web hosting companies for 90 days. The 90-day performance analysis of 22 web hosting companies provides a comprehensive assessment of their speed and reliability.', 'Categorization of web hosting companies into not recommended, average performing, and highly recommended, with exclusive discounts available. The categorization of web hosting companies, along with exclusive discounts, assists viewers in making informed decisions based on performance and value.', 'Offering exclusive discounts for some web hosting companies that are not available elsewhere on the Internet. The provision of exclusive discounts adds value for viewers seeking cost-effective web hosting solutions.']}], 'duration': 55.429, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik16175.jpg', 'highlights': ['Zero Wilson recorded and analyzed the performance of 22 web hosting companies for 90 days, providing a comprehensive assessment of their speed and reliability.', 'Categorization of web hosting companies into not recommended, average performing, and highly recommended, with exclusive discounts available, assists viewers in making informed decisions based on performance and value.', 'Offering exclusive discounts for some web hosting companies that are not available elsewhere on the Internet adds value for viewers seeking cost-effective web hosting solutions.']}, {'end': 420.504, 'segs': [{'end': 100.157, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 71.684, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 79.125, 'text': 'Now, I spent around $5, 000 performing this test to provide you all with real quality reviews so you can have real quality web hosting.', 'start': 71.684, 'duration': 7.441}, {'end': 85.146, 'text': 'So if you do decide to use any of the links in the description below of this video, it does help me make these tutorials for you for free.', 'start': 79.505, 'duration': 5.641}, {'end': 90.81, 'text': 'So before we start, let me show you all how I got these results and let me answer a common myth with web hosting.', 'start': 85.686, 'duration': 5.124}, {'end': 100.157, 'text': 'I purchased web hosting accounts from each of these companies and I installed the same size WordPress theme and starter website on each of these domains to provide a fair and accurate reading.', 'start': 91.61, 'duration': 8.547}], 'summary': 'Spent $5,000 on testing, offering real quality reviews for web hosting, with fair and accurate comparisons.', 'duration': 28.473, 'max_score': 71.684, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik71684.jpg'}, {'end': 146.054, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 105.9, 'weight': 1, 'content': [{'end': 111.203, 'text': 'I then recorded the uptime of the server and recorded every time the server went down for 90 days using Pingdom.', 'start': 105.9, 'duration': 5.303}, {'end': 118.308, 'text': 'Pingdom is a web hosting monitor that records everything about your website and is known as the best resource for monitoring web hosting.', 'start': 111.664, 'duration': 6.644}, {'end': 123.794, 'text': "So today, I'll be mainly focusing on two specific categories, page speed and downtime.", 'start': 118.948, 'duration': 4.846}, {'end': 126.397, 'text': 'Page speed is the time it takes for a website to load.', 'start': 124.294, 'duration': 2.103}, {'end': 128.359, 'text': 'The lower the number, the faster the server.', 'start': 126.537, 'duration': 1.822}, {'end': 129.821, 'text': 'Next is downtime.', 'start': 128.84, 'duration': 0.981}, {'end': 134.367, 'text': 'Downtime is how long the website went offline or was unavailable due to server issues.', 'start': 130.202, 'duration': 4.165}, {'end': 137.23, 'text': 'The more downtime, the less reliable the server is.', 'start': 134.707, 'duration': 2.523}, {'end': 141.853, 'text': 'And for you techies out there, I will also include the server response time,', 'start': 138.331, 'duration': 3.522}, {'end': 146.054, 'text': 'which is the amount of time it takes for a web browser to receive a response from the web host.', 'start': 141.853, 'duration': 4.201}], 'summary': 'Recorded server uptime and downtime for 90 days using pingdom, focusing on page speed and downtime as key metrics.', 'duration': 40.154, 'max_score': 105.9, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik105900.jpg'}, {'end': 367.189, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 201.005, 'weight': 3, 'content': [{'end': 201.585, 'text': 'And here they are.', 'start': 201.005, 'duration': 0.58}, {'end': 203.664, 'text': 'Number one is Hostgator.', 'start': 202.543, 'duration': 1.121}, {'end': 206.346, 'text': "Hostgator's performance over the years has been notoriously bad.", 'start': 203.764, 'duration': 2.582}, {'end': 210.569, 'text': 'Hostgator had an average load time of 5.5 seconds to load a website.', 'start': 206.746, 'duration': 3.823}, {'end': 214.192, 'text': 'It had an hour of downtime with 35 outages over 90 days.', 'start': 210.989, 'duration': 3.203}, {'end': 221.978, 'text': 'Hostgator is owned by EIG, which has a long reputation of buying mom and pop shops of web hosting and watering them down in return for a profit.', 'start': 214.772, 'duration': 7.206}, {'end': 225.32, 'text': 'I would avoid any web hosting company that is owned by EIG.', 'start': 222.438, 'duration': 2.882}, {'end': 227.661, 'text': 'Next, InMotion Hosting.', 'start': 226.281, 'duration': 1.38}, {'end': 236.483, 'text': 'InMotion Hosting had the slowest speed on the list, loading at around 6.7 seconds, and it also had 24 hours of downtime, which is just crazy.', 'start': 228.141, 'duration': 8.342}, {'end': 238.383, 'text': 'Avoid this one at all costs.', 'start': 236.943, 'duration': 1.44}, {'end': 242.324, 'text': 'Next is Bluehost, yet another EIG company.', 'start': 239.043, 'duration': 3.281}, {'end': 249.005, 'text': "Bluehost had an average load time of 4 seconds, but they had an average downtime of 23 minutes, which actually isn't that bad.", 'start': 242.744, 'duration': 6.261}, {'end': 254.326, 'text': 'This is probably the least slowest company that is owned by EIG, but I would still not recommend it.', 'start': 249.525, 'duration': 4.801}, {'end': 256.272, 'text': 'Next, Hostpapa.', 'start': 255.231, 'duration': 1.041}, {'end': 260.937, 'text': 'Sadly, this company used to be a lot faster, and at one point in my career, I did recommend them.', 'start': 256.713, 'duration': 4.224}, {'end': 267.023, 'text': 'Hostpapa had an average load time of 3.4 seconds with 33 minutes of downtime, which is not that bad.', 'start': 261.397, 'duration': 5.626}, {'end': 273.29, 'text': 'Yet companies downgrade their servers and upgrade, so hopefully next year, I can say something positive about Hostpapa.', 'start': 267.484, 'duration': 5.806}, {'end': 276.052, 'text': 'Next is iPage, another EIG company.', 'start': 273.65, 'duration': 2.402}, {'end': 281.517, 'text': 'iPage had an average load time of 4.67 seconds with 20 hours of downtime.', 'start': 276.312, 'duration': 5.205}, {'end': 285.961, 'text': "Yikes They do have dirt cheap prices, but that's probably because their service is terrible.", 'start': 281.777, 'duration': 4.184}, {'end': 287.902, 'text': 'Avoid this one at all costs if you can.', 'start': 286.221, 'duration': 1.681}, {'end': 290.324, 'text': 'Next, MediaTemple.net.', 'start': 288.823, 'duration': 1.501}, {'end': 293.044, 'text': 'This company had a long history of being slow.', 'start': 291.064, 'duration': 1.98}, {'end': 299.546, 'text': "MediaTemple's average load time was around 4.85 seconds with 3 hours of downtime over 90 days.", 'start': 293.464, 'duration': 6.082}, {'end': 301.847, 'text': 'Lastly, TMD Hosting.', 'start': 300.347, 'duration': 1.5}, {'end': 307.449, 'text': 'This one really pains me because I used to promote this company a few years ago on a lot of my past WordPress tutorials.', 'start': 302.187, 'duration': 5.262}, {'end': 313.491, 'text': "TMD's average load time was 3.93 seconds with more than 7 hours of downtime over 90 days.", 'start': 307.969, 'duration': 5.522}, {'end': 325.257, 'text': 'So those companies I do not recommend.', 'start': 323.715, 'duration': 1.542}, {'end': 330.745, 'text': 'Now these next companies, they barely met the Google standard of your site loading at around three seconds.', 'start': 325.357, 'duration': 5.388}, {'end': 333.348, 'text': "So with these next companies, I'm personally neutral.", 'start': 331.265, 'duration': 2.083}, {'end': 335.752, 'text': "I don't recommend them, but I'm not really against them.", 'start': 333.448, 'duration': 2.304}, {'end': 337.274, 'text': 'So if you want to try them out, go for it.', 'start': 335.852, 'duration': 1.422}, {'end': 338.716, 'text': 'First is Chemicloud.', 'start': 337.694, 'duration': 1.022}, {'end': 343.778, 'text': 'ChemiCloud barely met the Google standard of a load time of around 2.94 seconds,', 'start': 339.116, 'duration': 4.662}, {'end': 347.32, 'text': 'but actually had some small downtime of around 10 minutes over 90 days.', 'start': 343.778, 'duration': 3.542}, {'end': 351.802, 'text': 'Their pricing is decent with their middle WordPress pro plan being around $100 for the year.', 'start': 347.82, 'duration': 3.982}, {'end': 354.043, 'text': 'They also have some pretty low renewal fees.', 'start': 352.142, 'duration': 1.901}, {'end': 355.723, 'text': 'Next is FastComet.', 'start': 354.563, 'duration': 1.16}, {'end': 360.946, 'text': "Known for their dedicated hosting, FastComet's average load time on average was 2.5 seconds.", 'start': 356.004, 'duration': 4.942}, {'end': 365.288, 'text': 'They had two hours of downtime over 90 days, which is a little bad in my opinion.', 'start': 361.366, 'duration': 3.922}, {'end': 367.189, 'text': 'The prices are quite impressive.', 'start': 365.888, 'duration': 1.301}], 'summary': 'Hostgator, inmotion, bluehost, ipage, mediatemple, tmd hosting not recommended due to slow speed and downtime. chemicloud and fastcomet barely meet google standards, with fastcomet having lower load time and chemicloud having low downtime.', 'duration': 166.184, 'max_score': 201.005, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik201005.jpg'}, {'end': 417.502, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 388.305, 'weight': 12, 'content': [{'end': 391.828, 'text': "I have a full video on that and I'll leave that in the description below of this video.", 'start': 388.305, 'duration': 3.523}, {'end': 393.349, 'text': 'Next is GoDaddy.', 'start': 392.348, 'duration': 1.001}, {'end': 396.29, 'text': 'What would a web hosting test be without GoDaddy?', 'start': 393.689, 'duration': 2.601}, {'end': 404.375, 'text': 'GoDaddy barely met the Google standards with low times of 2.98 seconds and had a terrible amount of downtime with 16 hours.', 'start': 396.691, 'duration': 7.684}, {'end': 407.196, 'text': 'Yikes! GoDaddy recently changed its logo.', 'start': 404.595, 'duration': 2.601}, {'end': 410.958, 'text': "I'm not really sure what that's all about, but I think everyone knows them for their previous logo.", 'start': 407.356, 'duration': 3.602}, {'end': 417.502, 'text': 'They are a large corporate company, so now I think they rather appease to its shareholders than offer top quality services for their customers.', 'start': 411.759, 'duration': 5.743}], 'summary': 'Godaddy barely met google standards with 2.98s load time and 16 hours downtime, reflecting shareholder focus over service quality.', 'duration': 29.197, 'max_score': 388.305, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik388305.jpg'}], 'start': 71.684, 'title': 'Web hosting performance analysis', 'summary': "Provides a comprehensive analysis of web hosting performance, involving a $5,000 investment, monitoring of page speed and downtime every 30 minutes for 90 days, and recommendations to avoid companies failing to meet google's standard while being neutral towards others due to their varying load times and downtime.", 'chapters': [{'end': 146.054, 'start': 71.684, 'title': 'Web hosting performance analysis', 'summary': 'Outlines a comprehensive web hosting performance analysis, including a $5,000 investment in testing, monitoring of page speed and downtime every 30 minutes for 90 days, and a focus on page speed, downtime, and server response time.', 'duration': 74.37, 'highlights': ['The chapter emphasizes a $5,000 investment in testing, highlighting the commitment to providing real quality web hosting reviews and a dedication to offering free tutorials.', 'The monitoring of page speed and downtime every 30 minutes for 90 days demonstrates a rigorous and extensive approach to evaluating web hosting performance.', 'The focus on page speed, downtime, and server response time underscores the importance of key metrics in assessing web hosting reliability and performance.']}, {'end': 420.504, 'start': 146.655, 'title': 'Web hosting performance analysis', 'summary': "Evaluates the performance of various web hosting companies, highlighting their page speed, downtime, and renewal fees, and recommends avoiding companies failing to meet google's standard, such as hostgator, inmotion hosting, bluehost, hostpapa, ipage, mediatemple.net, and tmd hosting, while being neutral towards chemicloud, fastcomet, and godaddy due to their varying load times and downtime.", 'duration': 273.849, 'highlights': ["Hostgator's Poor Performance Hostgator had an average load time of 5.5 seconds, an hour of downtime with 35 outages over 90 days, and is owned by EIG, notorious for compromising web hosting quality for profit.", "InMotion Hosting's Slow Speed and Downtime InMotion Hosting had the slowest speed on the list, loading at around 6.7 seconds, and experienced 24 hours of downtime, making it highly recommended to avoid.", "Bluehost's Downtime Bluehost had an average load time of 4 seconds and an average downtime of 23 minutes, while being owned by EIG, making it not recommended despite its comparatively lesser downtime.", "Hostpapa's Decline in Speed Hostpapa had an average load time of 3.4 seconds with 33 minutes of downtime, indicating a decline in performance, but potential for improvement.", "iPage's Performance Issues iPage had an average load time of 4.67 seconds with 20 hours of downtime, offering cheap prices but subpar service quality.", "MediaTemple.net's Sluggishness MediaTemple's average load time was around 4.85 seconds with 3 hours of downtime over 90 days, reflecting a history of slow performance.", "TMD Hosting's Disappointing Results TMD's average load time was 3.93 seconds with more than 7 hours of downtime over 90 days, indicating a decline in performance from previous recommendations.", "Chemicloud's Marginal Compliance with Google Standards ChemiCloud barely met the Google standard with a load time of around 2.94 seconds and minimal downtime of around 10 minutes over 90 days, offering decent pricing and low renewal fees.", "FastComet's Dedicated Hosting Performance FastComet's average load time was 2.5 seconds with two hours of downtime over 90 days, offering impressive pricing and dedicated server specs, although some unnecessary extras.", "GoDaddy's Borderline Compliance with Google Standards GoDaddy barely met the Google standards with load times of 2.98 seconds and had a significant downtime of 16 hours, reflecting a corporate focus on shareholder appeasement over service quality."]}], 'duration': 348.82, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik71684.jpg', 'highlights': ['The chapter emphasizes a $5,000 investment in testing, highlighting the commitment to providing real quality web hosting reviews and a dedication to offering free tutorials.', 'The monitoring of page speed and downtime every 30 minutes for 90 days demonstrates a rigorous and extensive approach to evaluating web hosting performance.', 'The focus on page speed, downtime, and server response time underscores the importance of key metrics in assessing web hosting reliability and performance.', 'Hostgator had an average load time of 5.5 seconds, an hour of downtime with 35 outages over 90 days, and is owned by EIG, notorious for compromising web hosting quality for profit.', 'InMotion Hosting had the slowest speed on the list, loading at around 6.7 seconds, and experienced 24 hours of downtime, making it highly recommended to avoid.', 'Bluehost had an average load time of 4 seconds and an average downtime of 23 minutes, while being owned by EIG, making it not recommended despite its comparatively lesser downtime.', 'Hostpapa had an average load time of 3.4 seconds with 33 minutes of downtime, indicating a decline in performance, but potential for improvement.', 'iPage had an average load time of 4.67 seconds with 20 hours of downtime, offering cheap prices but subpar service quality.', "MediaTemple's average load time was around 4.85 seconds with 3 hours of downtime over 90 days, reflecting a history of slow performance.", "TMD's average load time was 3.93 seconds with more than 7 hours of downtime over 90 days, indicating a decline in performance from previous recommendations.", 'ChemiCloud barely met the Google standard with a load time of around 2.94 seconds and minimal downtime of around 10 minutes over 90 days, offering decent pricing and low renewal fees.', "FastComet's average load time was 2.5 seconds with two hours of downtime over 90 days, offering impressive pricing and dedicated server specs, although some unnecessary extras.", 'GoDaddy barely met the Google standards with load times of 2.98 seconds and had a significant downtime of 16 hours, reflecting a corporate focus on shareholder appeasement over service quality.']}, {'end': 713.388, 'segs': [{'end': 569.716, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 545.135, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 551.9, 'text': 'They had an average load time of 1.27 seconds with only five minutes of downtime, which is very impressive.', 'start': 545.135, 'duration': 6.765}, {'end': 555.703, 'text': 'Now, the only downside about Kinsta is that they are expensive.', 'start': 552.6, 'duration': 3.103}, {'end': 559.626, 'text': 'In fact, they are the most expensive company on this entire list.', 'start': 555.783, 'duration': 3.843}, {'end': 569.716, 'text': 'So, for $100 a month, you get about five WordPress installs, 100, 000 visits, which I think is the equivalent of around 200 gigs of bandwidth,', 'start': 559.727, 'duration': 9.989}], 'summary': 'Kinsta offers impressive 1.27s load time, 5 mins downtime, but is the most expensive, providing 5 wordpress installs and 100,000 visits for $100/month.', 'duration': 24.581, 'max_score': 545.135, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik545135.jpg'}, {'end': 628.763, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 604.592, 'weight': 1, 'content': [{'end': 611.616, 'text': 'So they had an average load time of 1.37 seconds with only seven minutes of downtime over the last 30 days.', 'start': 604.592, 'duration': 7.024}, {'end': 616.278, 'text': 'Now Cloudways is a little different than the other typical hosting companies.', 'start': 612.176, 'duration': 4.102}, {'end': 623.161, 'text': 'So they work as a middleman for companies like Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, Vulture, even DigitalOcean.', 'start': 616.698, 'duration': 6.463}, {'end': 628.763, 'text': 'they are a little expensive and you are better off going to those companies and doing it yourself.', 'start': 623.821, 'duration': 4.942}], 'summary': 'Cloudways has 1.37s average load time, 7 min downtime in 30 days, acts as a middleman for major cloud providers.', 'duration': 24.171, 'max_score': 604.592, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik604592.jpg'}, {'end': 679.105, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 648.011, 'weight': 2, 'content': [{'end': 653.515, 'text': "If you're brand new to WordPress, no, I do not recommend Cloudways, but for people who have been in the game for a while,", 'start': 648.011, 'duration': 5.504}, {'end': 656.637, 'text': 'Cloudways is a very good choice for web hosting.', 'start': 653.515, 'duration': 3.122}, {'end': 662.402, 'text': 'Next, we have A2 Hosting, and this is a suitable company for people who are brand new to WordPress.', 'start': 657.158, 'duration': 5.244}, {'end': 669.583, 'text': 'Now, A2 Hosting performed at around 2.18 seconds with only an hour of downtime.', 'start': 662.882, 'duration': 6.701}, {'end': 671.084, 'text': 'Actually, that is quite a long time.', 'start': 669.683, 'duration': 1.401}, {'end': 679.105, 'text': 'An hour of downtime over the last 90 days, they had about an hour of downtime.', 'start': 671.124, 'duration': 7.981}], 'summary': 'Cloudways is not recommended for beginners, but a2 hosting is suitable for new wordpress users, with 2.18 seconds performance and 1 hour downtime in the last 90 days.', 'duration': 31.094, 'max_score': 648.011, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik648011.jpg'}], 'start': 421.573, 'title': 'Web hosting performance and top companies', 'summary': 'Compares godaddy, greengeeks, and getflywheel web hosting services, highlighting page speeds, downtime, and pricing. it also highlights the top three web hosting companies with their performance data, pricing, and suitability for different user levels, recommending them based on speed, uptime, and pricing.', 'chapters': [{'end': 498.443, 'start': 421.573, 'title': 'Web hosting performance comparison', 'summary': 'Compares the performance of godaddy, greengeeks, and getflywheel web hosting services, highlighting the page speeds, downtime, and pricing, with greengeeks being the most affordable in terms of hosting and renewal fees but showing a decline in speed over the years.', 'duration': 76.87, 'highlights': ['GreenGeeks offers hosting for around $100 for a year and $160 for two years, with an average page speed of 2.9 seconds and around 43 minutes of downtime over 90 days.', 'GetFlywheel has an average load time of around 2.5 seconds and 26 minutes of downtime, but the pricing at $115 per month for hosting 10 websites without upgrades is considered high for the provided limits.', "GoDaddy's ultimate plan costs $12.99, while the maximum plan costs $19.99, with no discernible difference in service, contributing to its somewhat negative reputation despite having a large user base."]}, {'end': 713.388, 'start': 510.353, 'title': 'Top 10 web hosting companies', 'summary': 'Highlights the top three web hosting companies with their performance data, pricing, and suitability for different user levels, recommending them based on speed, uptime, and pricing.', 'duration': 203.035, 'highlights': ["Kinsta had an average load time of 1.27 seconds with only five minutes of downtime, making it one of the top-performing companies. Kinsta's impressive performance with an average load time of 1.27 seconds and minimal downtime of five minutes showcases its top-tier performance.", 'Cloudways had an average load time of 1.37 seconds with only seven minutes of downtime, providing good performance as a middleman for hosting services like Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, and others. Cloudways acts as a middleman for top hosting services and has a decent performance with an average load time of 1.37 seconds and minimal downtime of seven minutes.', "A2 Hosting's performance at around 2.18 seconds with only an hour of downtime over the last 90 days, making it a suitable choice for beginners and offering reasonable renewal fees. A2 Hosting's performance, though not the best, is suitable for beginners with an average load time of 2.18 seconds and minimal downtime of an hour over the last 90 days, along with reasonable renewal fees."]}], 'duration': 291.815, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik421573.jpg', 'highlights': ['Kinsta had an average load time of 1.27 seconds with only five minutes of downtime, showcasing top-tier performance.', 'Cloudways had an average load time of 1.37 seconds with only seven minutes of downtime, providing good performance as a middleman for hosting services.', "A2 Hosting's performance at around 2.18 seconds with only an hour of downtime over the last 90 days, making it a suitable choice for beginners."]}, {'end': 1660.923, 'segs': [{'end': 741.638, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 713.428, 'weight': 2, 'content': [{'end': 718.831, 'text': 'Now this company is fast, and I got a lot of requests to do this company, so I figured I would add it on my list.', 'start': 713.428, 'duration': 5.403}, {'end': 726.776, 'text': 'WPX had an average load time of 643 ms, which is probably the top three most fastest companies on this entire list.', 'start': 719.492, 'duration': 7.284}, {'end': 731.237, 'text': 'now they did have a problem with their, with their um, their downtime, unfortunately.', 'start': 727.356, 'duration': 3.881}, {'end': 735.597, 'text': 'so, uh, this is actually our fault, this was not their fault.', 'start': 731.237, 'duration': 4.36}, {'end': 741.638, 'text': 'um, we had a problem while listing their ip address, but we got it fixed, obviously, but they did have around, i want to say,', 'start': 735.597, 'duration': 6.041}], 'summary': 'Wpx had an average load time of 643 ms, ranking among the top three fastest companies. they faced downtime due to an ip address issue.', 'duration': 28.21, 'max_score': 713.428, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik713428.jpg'}, {'end': 790.81, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 767.807, 'weight': 4, 'content': [{'end': 775.391, 'text': 'So for the professional, you do get 15 websites, 20 gigs of storage and 200 gigs of bandwidth, which is pretty much what Kinza is offering.', 'start': 767.807, 'duration': 7.584}, {'end': 776.512, 'text': 'Pretty much the same thing.', 'start': 775.631, 'duration': 0.881}, {'end': 784.281, 'text': 'The elite plan, you can hold 35 websites with 40 gigs of storage and unlimited bandwidth.', 'start': 777.813, 'duration': 6.468}, {'end': 785.703, 'text': "I'm not really sure if that's really unlimited.", 'start': 784.321, 'duration': 1.382}, {'end': 787.846, 'text': "They all say that, but there's usually always a catch.", 'start': 785.743, 'duration': 2.103}, {'end': 790.81, 'text': "For the price you pay, it's not bad.", 'start': 788.727, 'duration': 2.083}], 'summary': 'Web hosting plans offer 15-35 websites, 20-40 gigs of storage, and unlimited bandwidth, with skepticism about the claim of unlimited bandwidth.', 'duration': 23.003, 'max_score': 767.807, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik767807.jpg'}, {'end': 963.329, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 939.82, 'weight': 3, 'content': [{'end': 946.485, 'text': 'WP Engine performed one of the fastest on this whole list, but again, they are the most expensive company on this list.', 'start': 939.82, 'duration': 6.665}, {'end': 955.067, 'text': 'SiteGround performed on average of a load time of 642 ms with only six minutes of downtime.', 'start': 947.625, 'duration': 7.442}, {'end': 956.908, 'text': 'That is extremely impressive.', 'start': 955.127, 'duration': 1.781}, {'end': 961.189, 'text': 'Now, the plans with the VP Engine are very expensive.', 'start': 957.628, 'duration': 3.561}, {'end': 963.329, 'text': 'So they are pretty much neck and neck with Kinsta.', 'start': 961.229, 'duration': 2.1}], 'summary': 'Wp engine is among the fastest but most expensive, while siteground shows impressive load time and minimal downtime.', 'duration': 23.509, 'max_score': 939.82, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik939820.jpg'}, {'end': 1466.728, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 1434.093, 'weight': 1, 'content': [{'end': 1437.538, 'text': 'Now they also offer a lot more than typical web hosting companies.', 'start': 1434.093, 'duration': 3.445}, {'end': 1445.349, 'text': 'So their load time on average was 1.15 seconds and they had only about one minute of downtime.', 'start': 1438.098, 'duration': 7.251}, {'end': 1450.533, 'text': "now i'm gonna explain why i rank hosting or number one compared to other web hosting companies.", 'start': 1445.769, 'duration': 4.764}, {'end': 1452.375, 'text': 'so i use their wordpress hosting plan.', 'start': 1450.533, 'duration': 1.842}, {'end': 1459.782, 'text': 'so if you go to hosting and you go to wordpress hosting this is the plan that i use for this specific test you get 100 gigs of disk space,', 'start': 1452.375, 'duration': 7.407}, {'end': 1466.728, 'text': "which is pretty much that's more than pretty much every the company on this entire list, and you also do get unlimited bandwidth.", 'start': 1459.782, 'duration': 6.946}], 'summary': 'Hosting company offers fast load time (1.15s) and 100gb disk space.', 'duration': 32.635, 'max_score': 1434.093, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik1434093.jpg'}, {'end': 1560.213, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 1530.625, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 1533.088, 'text': 'Hostinger is just, their plans are amazing.', 'start': 1530.625, 'duration': 2.463}, {'end': 1534.89, 'text': 'What they give to their customers is very good.', 'start': 1533.128, 'duration': 1.762}, {'end': 1544.461, 'text': "They speak like 40 languages, and if you're looking for cheap hosting I mean $139 for a year of WordPress hosting for these results,", 'start': 1535.251, 'duration': 9.21}, {'end': 1547.265, 'text': 'I would have to say, is the best value for your money.', 'start': 1544.461, 'duration': 2.804}, {'end': 1550.427, 'text': 'So again, I rank Hostinger number one this year.', 'start': 1547.825, 'duration': 2.602}, {'end': 1553.089, 'text': 'I think that their performance is great.', 'start': 1550.587, 'duration': 2.502}, {'end': 1557.832, 'text': 'I think that their uptime was amazing and their prices are super cheap.', 'start': 1553.309, 'duration': 4.523}, {'end': 1560.213, 'text': "So let's go take a look at their other plans really quick.", 'start': 1558.292, 'duration': 1.921}], 'summary': 'Hostinger offers great value, with plans in 40 languages, $139/year for wordpress hosting, and excellent performance and uptime.', 'duration': 29.588, 'max_score': 1530.625, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik1530625.jpg'}], 'start': 713.428, 'title': 'Web hosting performance evaluation', 'summary': "Evaluates web hosting companies, highlighting wpx's speed and downtime, and ranking hostinger as the top choice for fast performance, minimal downtime, and affordable prices, while also featuring known host's impressive speed and exclusive discounts.", 'chapters': [{'end': 787.846, 'start': 713.428, 'title': 'Wpx company performance review', 'summary': "Highlights wpx's impressive speed with an average load time of 643 ms, despite experiencing around three hours of downtime over the last 90 days, and compares their monthly plans with similar offerings in the industry.", 'duration': 74.418, 'highlights': ['WPX had an average load time of 643 ms, ranking among the top three fastest companies on the list, showcasing their impressive speed performance.', 'The company experienced around three hours of downtime over the last 90 days, which is considered a significant amount and could impact user experience and reliability.', "The professional monthly plan offers 15 websites, 20 gigs of storage, and 200 gigs of bandwidth, comparable to other industry offerings such as Kinza's.", "The elite plan allows hosting 35 websites with 40 gigs of storage and supposedly unlimited bandwidth, although the reality of 'unlimited' bandwidth is questioned, as it often comes with limitations."]}, {'end': 1660.923, 'start': 788.727, 'title': 'Best web hosting companies reviewed', 'summary': "Evaluates various web hosting companies based on speed, uptime, and pricing, ranking hostinger as the top choice due to its fast performance, minimal downtime, and affordable prices, while also highlighting known host's impressive speed and exclusive discounts available through the transcript.", 'duration': 872.196, 'highlights': ['Hostinger is ranked as the top web hosting company due to its fast performance, minimal downtime, and affordable prices, with an exclusive 10% discount available through the transcript. Hostinger offers 100 gigs of disk space, unlimited bandwidth, and LightSpeed servers, along with an exclusive 10% discount using the code Daryl, making it the best value for money.', 'Known Host impresses with an average load time of 1.13 seconds and no downtime over the last 30 days, offering exclusive discounts of 10% off the entire purchase, applicable to shared hosting, dedicated servers, and reseller hosting, as well as 60% off WordPress hosting using the code Daryl10 and Daryl60. Known Host provides impressive performance with exclusive discounts such as 10% off the entire purchase, 60% off WordPress hosting, and 40% off managed VPS and cloud hosting, making it a cost-effective and reliable option.', "WP Engine delivers one of the fastest speeds with an average load time of 642 ms and only six minutes of downtime, offering an exclusive discount through the transcript, reducing the monthly fee from $115 to $95. WP Engine's exceptional speed and minimal downtime, along with an exclusive discount reducing the monthly fee, make it a high-performance but slightly expensive option for web hosting."]}], 'duration': 947.495, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/uH3p9sJa8ik/pics/uH3p9sJa8ik713428.jpg', 'highlights': ['Hostinger is ranked as the top web hosting company due to its fast performance, minimal downtime, and affordable prices, with an exclusive 10% discount available through the transcript.', 'Known Host impresses with an average load time of 1.13 seconds and no downtime over the last 30 days, offering exclusive discounts of 10% off the entire purchase, applicable to shared hosting, dedicated servers, and reseller hosting, as well as 60% off WordPress hosting using the code Daryl10 and Daryl60.', 'WPX had an average load time of 643 ms, ranking among the top three fastest companies on the list, showcasing their impressive speed performance.', 'WP Engine delivers one of the fastest speeds with an average load time of 642 ms and only six minutes of downtime, offering an exclusive discount through the transcript, reducing the monthly fee from $115 to $95.', "The elite plan allows hosting 35 websites with 40 gigs of storage and supposedly unlimited bandwidth, although the reality of 'unlimited' bandwidth is questioned, as it often comes with limitations.", "The professional monthly plan offers 15 websites, 20 gigs of storage, and 200 gigs of bandwidth, comparable to other industry offerings such as Kinza's."]}], 'highlights': ['Zero Wilson recorded and analyzed the performance of 22 web hosting companies for 90 days, providing a comprehensive assessment of their speed and reliability.', 'Categorization of web hosting companies into not recommended, average performing, and highly recommended, with exclusive discounts available, assists viewers in making informed decisions based on performance and value.', 'Offering exclusive discounts for some web hosting companies that are not available elsewhere on the Internet adds value for viewers seeking cost-effective web hosting solutions.', 'The chapter emphasizes a $5,000 investment in testing, highlighting the commitment to providing real quality web hosting reviews and a dedication to offering free tutorials.', 'The monitoring of page speed and downtime every 30 minutes for 90 days demonstrates a rigorous and extensive approach to evaluating web hosting performance.', 'The focus on page speed, downtime, and server response time underscores the importance of key metrics in assessing web hosting reliability and performance.', 'Hostinger is ranked as the top web hosting company due to its fast performance, minimal downtime, and affordable prices, with an exclusive 10% discount available through the transcript.', 'Known Host impresses with an average load time of 1.13 seconds and no downtime over the last 30 days, offering exclusive discounts of 10% off the entire purchase, applicable to shared hosting, dedicated servers, and reseller hosting, as well as 60% off WordPress hosting using the code Daryl10 and Daryl60.', 'WPX had an average load time of 643 ms, ranking among the top three fastest companies on the list, showcasing their impressive speed performance.', 'WP Engine delivers one of the fastest speeds with an average load time of 642 ms and only six minutes of downtime, offering an exclusive discount through the transcript, reducing the monthly fee from $115 to $95.']}