title
Best Web Hosting for WordPress 2023 (25 Web Hosts COMPARED)

description
Its Time! Make sure you get the best web hosting for WordPress with this web hosting test we ran for 1 year! This is one of the best web hosting tests ever created on the internet and really excited to bring you all the results! NOTE: We Used The Base plans for each test, you may get better performance for each web host by choosing a higher plan. My Top Picks For Best Web Hosting: 1. Namehero: https://www.darrelwilson.com/namehero (Discount Through Link) 2. Cloudways: https://www.darrelwilson.com/cloudways (Use Code Darrel25 For 25% OFF) 3. Hostinger: https://www.darrelwilson.com/hostinger ( Use Code Darrel For Extra 10% OFF) Winners For Best Web Hosting For Shared: 1. Hostinger: https://www.darrelwilson.com/hostinger (Use Code Darrel for +10% OFF) 2. A2-Hosting: https://www.darrelwilson.com/a2 3.ChemiCloud: https://www.darrelwilson.com/chemicloud 4.SiteGround: https://www.darrelwilson.com/siteground 5.KnownHost: https://www.darrelwilson.com/knownhost (use code DARREL4030) Winners For The Best Cloud Hosting: 1. Namehero: https://www.darrelwilson.com/namehero (Discount Through Link) 2. WPX Hosting https://www.darrelwilson.com/wpx 3. Liquid Web: https://www.darrelwilson.com/liquidweb (Discount Through Link) 4. Hostinger Cloud: https://www.darrelwilson.com/hostinger (use code darrel for 10% OFF) Here Are The Best Web Hosting For Managed Cloud: 1. Cloudways Vultr: https://www.darrelwilson.com/cloudways (use code darrel for 25% OFF) 2. Cloudways Digital Ocean: https://www.darrelwilson.com/cloudways (use code darrel for 25% OFF) 3. WP-Engine: https://www.darrelwilson.com/wpengine (code darrel gives 25% OFF) 5. Kinsta: http://www.darrelwilson.com/kinsta In this video, I fully test ALL web hosting providers for 1 year to bring you the best web hosting for your WordPress website! Again I wish you the best and good luck with your new web hosting company! If you are using the hosts that suck, make sure to switch. 👉👉Important Links Our Elementor Pro Templates: https://darrelwilson.com/product-category/elementor-pro-templates/ My Kopi Coffee Website: https://www.kopicoffee.com Our Pinterest With Design Templates: https://www.pinterest.com/OfficialDarrelWilson/ Connect with me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/DarrelWilsonYT My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/DarrelWilson03 Join Our WP Social Network: https://wpfriends.com Visit My Website at https://www.darrelwilson.com Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 00:04:12 - Shared Web Hosting 00:09:36 - Cloud Web Hosting 00:14:21 - Manage Web Hosting 00:19:34 - Cloudways BreakDown 00:20:20 - Winners 00:20:45 - Outro Learn about the different types of web hosting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaohKvUpXxc&feature=youtu.be Check out my other Multilingual WordPress Tutorial Youtube Channels! Spanish Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1Sm53FofDOVA5T0pzyebEA Arabic Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDxCp7gMbzmNIjUqOCu1xcg/videos Hindi Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjTje7OJghnjEJ8d4llefQw Portuguese Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOs-QXBdlmT0YL3I-bnyeug French Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLEH_xAh0VxCTSq1AQBYPsg German Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTkmZD2BCJpedWe4Hb5QVLw Want more help and news on WordPress? Feel free to visit my website at https://www.darrelwilson.com

detail
{'title': 'Best Web Hosting for WordPress 2023 (25 Web Hosts COMPARED)', 'heatmap': [{'end': 1240.093, 'start': 1210.817, 'weight': 0.743}], 'summary': 'A comprehensive review compares the performance metrics and hosting recommendations of 25 web hosting companies, categorizing them into shared hosting, cloud hosting, and managed cloud hosting, with specific load times, uptime percentages, and pricing plans highlighted. the analysis provides valuable insights into optimal performance metrics and recommends top choices for different hosting categories, including a 20% discount offer for vultr as the best cloud hosting provider.', 'chapters': [{'end': 131.278, 'segs': [{'end': 57.371, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 32.375, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 39.058, 'text': "So what I've done for this test, I've recorded the performance and uptime of 25 different web hosting companies for one whole year.", 'start': 32.375, 'duration': 6.683}, {'end': 45.12, 'text': "And today in this video, I'll show you my results of companies that perform really well and also companies that did not perform well.", 'start': 39.458, 'duration': 5.662}, {'end': 51.606, 'text': "And don't worry, I won't sit here and say well, all the hosting companies are good, like you've probably seen on many blogs, right?", 'start': 45.8, 'duration': 5.806}, {'end': 57.371, 'text': "No, I want to provide real value, so I'll be showing you companies that I recommend and also companies to avoid.", 'start': 51.946, 'duration': 5.425}], 'summary': 'Monitored 25 web hosting companies for a year, revealing top performers and ones to avoid.', 'duration': 24.996, 'max_score': 32.375, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M32375.jpg'}, {'end': 88.534, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 64.977, 'weight': 2, 'content': [{'end': 73.404, 'text': 'I purchased web hosting accounts from each of these companies and I installed the same size WordPress theme and starter website on each of these domains to provide a fair and accurate reading.', 'start': 64.977, 'duration': 8.427}, {'end': 79.148, 'text': 'I then monitored the page speed and uptime of each of these websites every 30 minutes for one whole year.', 'start': 73.944, 'duration': 5.204}, {'end': 88.534, 'text': 'We also hired someone to cache the websites weekly and update the plugins and themes in order to prevent outdated plugins or themes that could cause conflict with the websites.', 'start': 79.588, 'duration': 8.946}], 'summary': 'Monitored web hosting accounts for one year, tracking page speed and uptime every 30 minutes, with weekly website caching and plugin updates.', 'duration': 23.557, 'max_score': 64.977, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M64977.jpg'}, {'end': 141.664, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 115.022, 'weight': 1, 'content': [{'end': 120.883, 'text': "Plus as a bonus, I've also tested all of the Cloudways hosting providers and I'll provide these results later in the video.", 'start': 115.022, 'duration': 5.861}, {'end': 124.694, 'text': "Now, if you're not sure what these web hosting types mean, don't worry,", 'start': 121.912, 'duration': 2.782}, {'end': 131.278, 'text': "because I have a full video explaining each type of web hosting and I'll put that in the description of this video for you to watch later.", 'start': 124.694, 'duration': 6.584}, {'end': 135.48, 'text': "For this test, I'll be mainly focusing on three specific categories.", 'start': 132.258, 'duration': 3.222}, {'end': 138.923, 'text': 'Page speed, uptime, and server response time.', 'start': 135.921, 'duration': 3.002}, {'end': 141.664, 'text': 'Page speed is the time it takes for your website to load.', 'start': 139.403, 'duration': 2.261}], 'summary': 'Tested cloudways hosting providers for page speed, uptime, and server response time.', 'duration': 26.642, 'max_score': 115.022, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M115022.jpg'}], 'start': 17.631, 'title': 'Web host performance test results', 'summary': 'Reveals a year-long test results of 25 web hosting companies, categorizing them into shared hosting, cloud hosting, and managed cloud hosting, with details on best and worst performers and additional results on cloudways hosting providers.', 'chapters': [{'end': 131.278, 'start': 17.631, 'title': 'Fastest and slowest web hosts revealed', 'summary': 'Unveils the results of a year-long test monitoring the performance and uptime of 25 web hosting companies, determining the best and worst performers, and categorizing them into shared hosting, cloud hosting, and managed cloud hosting, with additional results on cloudways hosting providers.', 'duration': 113.647, 'highlights': ['The chapter unveils the results of a year-long test monitoring the performance and uptime of 25 web hosting companies. The speaker conducted a year-long test monitoring the performance and uptime of 25 different web hosting companies to reveal their results.', 'Categorizing the web hosting companies into shared hosting, cloud hosting, and managed cloud hosting, with additional results on Cloudways hosting providers. The web hosting companies are categorized into shared hosting, cloud hosting, and managed cloud hosting, with additional results on Cloudways hosting providers.', 'The speaker purchased web hosting accounts from each company, installed the same size WordPress theme and starter website on each domain, and monitored the page speed and uptime of each website every 30 minutes for one year. The speaker ensured a fair and accurate reading by purchasing web hosting accounts from each company, installing the same size WordPress theme and starter website on each domain, and monitoring the page speed and uptime of each website every 30 minutes for one year.']}], 'duration': 113.647, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M17631.jpg', 'highlights': ['The speaker conducted a year-long test monitoring the performance and uptime of 25 different web hosting companies to reveal their results.', 'The web hosting companies are categorized into shared hosting, cloud hosting, and managed cloud hosting, with additional results on Cloudways hosting providers.', 'The speaker ensured a fair and accurate reading by purchasing web hosting accounts from each company, installing the same size WordPress theme and starter website on each domain, and monitoring the page speed and uptime of each website every 30 minutes for one year.']}, {'end': 471.604, 'segs': [{'end': 190.939, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 151.55, 'weight': 3, 'content': [{'end': 154.252, 'text': 'The higher the uptime, the more reliable the web host is.', 'start': 151.55, 'duration': 2.702}, {'end': 156.333, 'text': 'Lastly, server response time.', 'start': 154.672, 'duration': 1.661}, {'end': 160.355, 'text': 'This is the time it takes for a web browser to receive a response from the server.', 'start': 156.813, 'duration': 3.542}, {'end': 162.577, 'text': 'The lower the number, the faster the server.', 'start': 160.696, 'duration': 1.881}, {'end': 167.42, 'text': 'So, even with these results, how do you know if your web hosting is fast or reliable?', 'start': 163.377, 'duration': 4.043}, {'end': 171.103, 'text': 'Google recommends your website should be loading at under 3 seconds.', 'start': 168.081, 'duration': 3.022}, {'end': 177.308, 'text': 'Anything above this will cause you to lose visitors, have a high bounce rate, and you can also lose SEO rankings.', 'start': 171.604, 'duration': 5.704}, {'end': 183.613, 'text': 'A study done by Dun & Bradstreet suggests web hosting companies on average should have an annual uptime with at least 99.50%.', 'start': 177.808, 'duration': 5.805}, {'end': 190.939, 'text': 'Anything below this is below average in the web hosting industry and you should probably change your web host.', 'start': 183.613, 'duration': 7.326}], 'summary': 'Web hosts should aim for at least 99.50% annual uptime and aim for website loading under 3 seconds to avoid losing visitors and seo rankings.', 'duration': 39.389, 'max_score': 151.55, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M151550.jpg'}, {'end': 302.403, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 258.064, 'weight': 1, 'content': [{'end': 260.466, 'text': 'GoDaddy is probably the largest web host in the world.', 'start': 258.064, 'duration': 2.402}, {'end': 268.213, 'text': "On average, their site's loaded at around 2.39 seconds, with an annual uptime of 99.69%, which ain't that bad.", 'start': 260.827, 'duration': 7.386}, {'end': 273.177, 'text': "I'll be honest, this company has definitely improved from last year, but it's still not one of my favorites.", 'start': 268.753, 'duration': 4.424}, {'end': 275.672, 'text': 'Next up, A2 Hosting.', 'start': 274.051, 'duration': 1.621}, {'end': 277.593, 'text': 'Again, another surprise for me.', 'start': 276.392, 'duration': 1.201}, {'end': 287.937, 'text': 'A2 Hosting has dramatically increased performance from last year with an average load time of 1.17 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.97%.', 'start': 277.933, 'duration': 10.004}, {'end': 288.417, 'text': 'Good for them.', 'start': 287.937, 'duration': 0.48}, {'end': 292.239, 'text': "They're not a bad option if you're looking for web hosting to get started with WordPress.", 'start': 288.937, 'duration': 3.302}, {'end': 294.18, 'text': 'Next up, ChemiCloud.', 'start': 292.919, 'duration': 1.261}, {'end': 302.403, 'text': 'KamiCloud had a load time of 2.47 seconds with an annual uptime of 99.99% which is actually very impressive.', 'start': 295.04, 'duration': 7.363}], 'summary': "Godaddy's average load time is 2.39 seconds, with 99.69% annual uptime. a2 hosting improved significantly with a load time of 1.17 seconds and 99.97% uptime. chemicloud has a load time of 2.47 seconds and an impressive 99.99% uptime.", 'duration': 44.339, 'max_score': 258.064, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M258064.jpg'}, {'end': 364.031, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 341.779, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 350.364, 'text': 'Hostinger had some great speeds with their load time being around 938ms which is under 1 second yet they did have an average uptime of 99.82%.', 'start': 341.779, 'duration': 8.585}, {'end': 356.967, 'text': 'I personally recommend this company on my other YouTube channels and the users seem to love it.', 'start': 350.364, 'duration': 6.603}, {'end': 362.23, 'text': 'They are the only hosting company on this entire list that offers 40 languages on their website.', 'start': 357.487, 'duration': 4.743}, {'end': 364.031, 'text': 'Next up, InMotion.', 'start': 362.93, 'duration': 1.101}], 'summary': 'Hostinger has a load time of 938ms, uptime of 99.82%, recommended by the host, offers 40 languages on their website.', 'duration': 22.252, 'max_score': 341.779, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M341779.jpg'}, {'end': 451.791, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 427.459, 'weight': 2, 'content': [{'end': 434.662, 'text': 'Known host websites on average load at around 1.16 seconds with a 99.97% of annual uptime.', 'start': 427.459, 'duration': 7.203}, {'end': 440.605, 'text': 'Just one thing, their backend seems a little outdated, but they have always seemed to be a very legit web host.', 'start': 435.222, 'duration': 5.383}, {'end': 442.746, 'text': 'Next, Hostpapa.', 'start': 441.505, 'duration': 1.241}, {'end': 444.147, 'text': 'This one pains me.', 'start': 443.326, 'duration': 0.821}, {'end': 451.791, 'text': 'Hostpapa on average had load times of around 3.66 seconds, but they had a very low annual uptime with only 98.21%.', 'start': 444.567, 'duration': 7.224}], 'summary': "Known host websites load at 1.16s with 99.97% uptime; hostpapa's load time is 3.66s with 98.21% uptime.", 'duration': 24.332, 'max_score': 427.459, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M427459.jpg'}], 'start': 132.258, 'title': 'Web hosting performance metrics', 'summary': "Covers the significance of page speed, uptime, and server response time in web hosting, including recommendations for optimal performance such as google's loading time recommendation of under 3 seconds and dun & bradstreet's suggestion of an annual uptime of at least 99.50%. it also provides an analysis and review of various web hosting companies based on load time and uptime, with specific performance metrics for each company.", 'chapters': [{'end': 239.622, 'start': 132.258, 'title': 'Web hosting test and recommendations', 'summary': "Covers the significance of page speed, uptime, and server response time in web hosting, with recommendations for optimal performance, including google's loading time recommendation of under 3 seconds and dun & bradstreet's suggestion of an annual uptime of at least 99.50%. it also addresses common myths, such as unlimited storage and bandwidth, and renewal fees, emphasizing the importance of considering these factors when choosing a web hosting service.", 'duration': 107.364, 'highlights': ["Google recommends website loading at under 3 seconds. Google's recommendation for website loading time is under 3 seconds, as exceeding this can lead to visitor loss, high bounce rates, and potential SEO ranking decrease.", "Dun & Bradstreet suggests web hosting companies should have an annual uptime of at least 99.50%. Dun & Bradstreet's study suggests that web hosting companies should aim for an annual uptime of at least 99.50% to be considered above average in the industry.", 'Addressing the myth of unlimited storage and bandwidth in web hosting packages. The transcript addresses the common misconception of unlimited storage and bandwidth in web hosting packages, highlighting the importance of clarifying the actual limits with the hosting company.', 'Importance of considering renewal fees when choosing a web hosting service. Emphasizing the significance of considering renewal fees when selecting a web hosting service, as the initial sales price may differ from the renewal cost.']}, {'end': 341.019, 'start': 240.003, 'title': 'Web hosting performance analysis', 'summary': "Analyzes the performance of various web hosting companies, highlighting their average load times, annual uptime percentages, and the speaker's personal recommendations for each company.", 'duration': 101.016, 'highlights': ['Hostgator had an average load time of 12.79 seconds, which is terrible, but had an annual uptime of 99.87%.', 'A2 Hosting dramatically increased performance from last year with an average load time of 1.17 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.97%.', "GoDaddy's site loaded at around 2.39 seconds, with an annual uptime of 99.69%.", 'ChemiCloud had a load time of 2.47 seconds with an annual uptime of 99.99%, which is very impressive.']}, {'end': 471.604, 'start': 341.779, 'title': 'Web hosting performance review', 'summary': 'Compares the performance of various web hosting companies based on load time and uptime, with hostinger leading with a load time of 938ms and an uptime of 99.82%, while hostpapa lags behind with a load time of 3.66 seconds and an uptime of 98.21%.', 'duration': 129.825, 'highlights': ['Hostinger had a load time of 938ms and an uptime of 99.82%. Hostinger leads with a load time of 938ms and an uptime of 99.82%.', 'Hostpapa had a load time of 3.66 seconds and an uptime of 98.21%. Hostpapa lags behind with a load time of 3.66 seconds and an uptime of 98.21%.', 'Known host had an average load time of 1.16 seconds and an uptime of 99.97%. Known host performs well with an average load time of 1.16 seconds and an uptime of 99.97%.']}], 'duration': 339.346, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M132258.jpg', 'highlights': ['Hostinger leads with a load time of 938ms and an uptime of 99.82%.', 'A2 Hosting dramatically increased performance with an average load time of 1.17 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.97%.', 'Known host performs well with an average load time of 1.16 seconds and an uptime of 99.97%.', 'Google recommends website loading at under 3 seconds.', "Dun & Bradstreet's study suggests that web hosting companies should aim for an annual uptime of at least 99.50% to be considered above average in the industry.", 'ChemiCloud had a load time of 2.47 seconds with an annual uptime of 99.99%, which is very impressive.', "GoDaddy's site loaded at around 2.39 seconds, with an annual uptime of 99.69%."]}, {'end': 694.918, 'segs': [{'end': 498.048, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 472.225, 'weight': 4, 'content': [{'end': 476.648, 'text': 'They had an average load time of 3.1 seconds with an annual uptime of 99.98%.', 'start': 472.225, 'duration': 4.423}, {'end': 476.868, 'text': 'Not bad.', 'start': 476.648, 'duration': 0.22}, {'end': 477.629, 'text': 'Next up, Fast Comet.', 'start': 476.908, 'duration': 0.721}, {'end': 485.396, 'text': "Known for their dedicated hosting, FastComet's shared servers perform pretty well.", 'start': 481.872, 'duration': 3.524}, {'end': 491.802, 'text': 'FastComet had an average load time of 3.38 seconds, with an average annual uptime of 99.97%.', 'start': 485.916, 'duration': 5.886}, {'end': 498.048, 'text': "I've used their service before for dedicated hosting, but not for shared, but it doesn't seem like a bad option.", 'start': 491.802, 'duration': 6.246}], 'summary': "Fastcomet's shared servers had an average load time of 3.38 seconds with 99.97% annual uptime, offering good performance.", 'duration': 25.823, 'max_score': 472.225, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M472225.jpg'}, {'end': 562.034, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 539.84, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 548.723, 'text': "Dreamhost's websites on average load at around 5.02 seconds, with an annual uptime of 98.54%, which is just terrible.", 'start': 539.84, 'duration': 8.883}, {'end': 550.224, 'text': 'Make sure to hide from these guys.', 'start': 549.243, 'duration': 0.981}, {'end': 553.41, 'text': 'Alright, so that pretty much sums up the shared hosting.', 'start': 551.209, 'duration': 2.201}, {'end': 562.034, 'text': 'The companies I would recommend on this list would have to be A2 Hosting, ChemiCloud, KnownHost, SiteGround, and my top pick would be Hostinger.', 'start': 553.49, 'duration': 8.544}], 'summary': "Dreamhost's websites load at 5.02 seconds with 98.54% annual uptime. consider a2 hosting, chemicloud, knownhost, siteground, or hostinger.", 'duration': 22.194, 'max_score': 539.84, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M539840.jpg'}, {'end': 654.13, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 599.211, 'weight': 1, 'content': [{'end': 601.993, 'text': "So if you go to Liquid Web, you'll basically be referred to Nexus.", 'start': 599.211, 'duration': 2.782}, {'end': 608.995, 'text': 'Liquid Web had an average load time of 1.31 seconds and had an average annual uptime of 99.99%.', 'start': 602.933, 'duration': 6.062}, {'end': 614.917, 'text': "I like the pricing plans at Liquid Web because they're very diversified, for pretty much beginners,", 'start': 608.995, 'duration': 5.922}, {'end': 617.378, 'text': 'all the way to the end of people receiving millions of visitors.', 'start': 614.917, 'duration': 2.461}, {'end': 625.401, 'text': 'The most ideal plan is a designer plan which can host up to 10 websites with 4 terabytes of bandwidth for around 50 bucks a month.', 'start': 617.978, 'duration': 7.423}, {'end': 628.343, 'text': 'They also do provide phone support, which is pretty cool.', 'start': 626.041, 'duration': 2.302}, {'end': 633.508, 'text': "Their backend dashboard is really easy to understand and you'll see your invoices right away when you log in.", 'start': 628.844, 'duration': 4.664}, {'end': 635.569, 'text': 'Overall, I do like their dashboard.', 'start': 634.028, 'duration': 1.541}, {'end': 637.211, 'text': "It's simple and easy to follow.", 'start': 635.75, 'duration': 1.461}, {'end': 643.797, 'text': 'I do think they need to clarify the differences between Nexus and Liquid Web or just completely change the website to only one website.', 'start': 637.811, 'duration': 5.986}, {'end': 645.899, 'text': 'Next up, WPX Hosting.', 'start': 644.477, 'duration': 1.422}, {'end': 654.13, 'text': 'WPX Hosting had an average load time of 892ms with an annual uptime of 99.85% which is not bad at all.', 'start': 646.659, 'duration': 7.471}], 'summary': 'Liquid web offers diversified pricing plans, with average load time of 1.31 seconds and 99.99% uptime. wpx hosting has an average load time of 892ms and 99.85% uptime.', 'duration': 54.919, 'max_score': 599.211, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M599211.jpg'}], 'start': 472.225, 'title': 'Hosting performance and recommendations', 'summary': 'Reviews shared hosting performance, recommending a2 hosting, chemicloud, knownhost, siteground, and hostinger, and compares and recommends liquid web and wpx hosting for cloud hosting, highlighting their average load times and annual uptime percentages, and pricing plans.', 'chapters': [{'end': 562.034, 'start': 472.225, 'title': 'Shared hosting performance review', 'summary': 'Reviews the performance of various shared hosting providers, highlighting average load times and annual uptime percentages. a2 hosting, chemicloud, knownhost, siteground, and hostinger are recommended as top choices.', 'duration': 89.809, 'highlights': ['A2 Hosting, ChemiCloud, KnownHost, SiteGround, and Hostinger are recommended as top choices, based on their performance in average load times and annual uptime percentages.', 'Bluehost exhibited slow average load times of 4.71 seconds and an annual uptime of only 99.42%, indicating poor performance and suggesting users to consider switching to other providers.', 'Dreamhost showed poor performance with websites loading at around 5.02 seconds on average and an annual uptime of 98.54%, highlighting the need to avoid this provider.', "Host Armada's website loaded at around 3.92 seconds with an annual uptime of 99.91%, indicating average performance and suggesting they have good server response time.", 'FastComet had an average load time of 3.38 seconds and an average annual uptime of 99.97%, positioning them as a viable option for shared hosting.']}, {'end': 694.918, 'start': 562.554, 'title': 'Cloud hosting comparison and recommendations', 'summary': "Compares and recommends liquid web and wpx hosting for cloud hosting, highlighting liquid web's average load time of 1.31 seconds and annual uptime of 99.99%, along with its diversified pricing plans, and wpx hosting's average load time of 892ms and annual uptime of 99.85%, despite being relatively expensive.", 'duration': 132.364, 'highlights': ["Liquid Web's average load time of 1.31 seconds and annual uptime of 99.99% make it a strong contender for cloud hosting. Liquid Web's impressive performance with an average load time of 1.31 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.99% demonstrates its reliability and speed.", "WPX Hosting's average load time of 892ms and annual uptime of 99.85% showcase its competitive speed and reliability. WPX Hosting's average load time of 892ms and annual uptime of 99.85% highlight its competitive speed and reliability in the cloud hosting market.", "Liquid Web's pricing plans are diversified, catering to beginners and high-traffic websites, with the designer plan offering 4 terabytes of bandwidth for around $50 a month. Liquid Web's pricing plans are diverse, catering to a wide range of users from beginners to high-traffic websites, offering the designer plan with 4 terabytes of bandwidth for around $50 a month.", 'WPX Hosting offers custom-made backend and login, with plans starting at $25 a month and going up to $100 a month, providing options for 5 to 35 websites and limited space. WPX Hosting offers custom-made backend and login, with plans ranging from $25 to $100 per month, providing options for 5 to 35 websites and limited space, despite being relatively expensive.']}], 'duration': 222.693, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M472225.jpg', 'highlights': ['A2 Hosting, ChemiCloud, KnownHost, SiteGround, and Hostinger are recommended as top choices, based on their performance in average load times and annual uptime percentages.', "Liquid Web's average load time of 1.31 seconds and annual uptime of 99.99% make it a strong contender for cloud hosting.", "WPX Hosting's average load time of 892ms and annual uptime of 99.85% showcase its competitive speed and reliability.", "Liquid Web's pricing plans are diversified, catering to beginners and high-traffic websites, with the designer plan offering 4 terabytes of bandwidth for around $50 a month.", 'FastComet had an average load time of 3.38 seconds and an average annual uptime of 99.97%, positioning them as a viable option for shared hosting.']}, {'end': 969.03, 'segs': [{'end': 755.623, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 713.954, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 715.115, 'text': 'This is my personal favorite.', 'start': 713.954, 'duration': 1.161}, {'end': 723.282, 'text': "On average, my website's load at around 770ms with an annual uptime of 99.99%, which is very, very impressive.", 'start': 715.455, 'duration': 7.827}, {'end': 729.508, 'text': 'This is the hosting company that I personally recommend on my own YouTube channel and also for all of my WordPress tutorials,', 'start': 723.762, 'duration': 5.746}, {'end': 730.608, 'text': 'and users seem to love it.', 'start': 729.508, 'duration': 1.1}, {'end': 735.331, 'text': 'I randomly stumbled on this company a few years ago when they only sold reseller hosting.', 'start': 731.269, 'duration': 4.062}, {'end': 739.934, 'text': "They have now switched their model to cloud hosting primarily and it's working really well for them.", 'start': 735.812, 'duration': 4.122}, {'end': 743.016, 'text': 'What I like most about NameHero is the prices.', 'start': 740.895, 'duration': 2.121}, {'end': 749.36, 'text': 'Now these are special promo prices that are only available through my link and the owner gave me this discount exclusively for my viewers.', 'start': 743.316, 'duration': 6.044}, {'end': 755.623, 'text': 'The starter cloud plan starts around $2.40 and their business cloud plan goes up to $9.', 'start': 750.04, 'duration': 5.583}], 'summary': 'Namehero hosting offers fast load times (770ms) with 99.99% uptime, recommended on youtube, starting at $2.40.', 'duration': 41.669, 'max_score': 713.954, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M713954.jpg'}, {'end': 815.75, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 774.468, 'weight': 2, 'content': [{'end': 777.929, 'text': "It's really easy to see your domains, your plans, and your billing information.", 'start': 774.468, 'duration': 3.461}, {'end': 782.63, 'text': 'NameHero also does have a very easy setup wizard with a quick install for WordPress.', 'start': 778.629, 'duration': 4.001}, {'end': 787.831, 'text': "You simply go get your domain, you press quick install, and you'll have your website up and running in a few clicks.", 'start': 782.99, 'duration': 4.841}, {'end': 792.852, 'text': 'They also do have tons of five-star positive reviews, which you can simply find anywhere on the internet.', 'start': 788.571, 'duration': 4.281}, {'end': 797.815, 'text': 'The owner, Ryan Gray, is pretty involved with the community and with his company,', 'start': 793.832, 'duration': 3.983}, {'end': 802.059, 'text': 'and you can usually find them on YouTube creating tutorials to streamline the hosting process.', 'start': 797.815, 'duration': 4.244}, {'end': 806.563, 'text': 'I got a lot of requests to do the Hostinger Cloud, so I decided to give it a try.', 'start': 802.96, 'duration': 3.603}, {'end': 815.75, 'text': 'The speed of Hostinger Cloud on average, they had a load time of 1.68 seconds, and their average uptime was around 99.99%.', 'start': 807.163, 'duration': 8.587}], 'summary': 'Namehero offers easy setup for wordpress with quick install. hostinger cloud has 1.68s load time and 99.99% uptime.', 'duration': 41.282, 'max_score': 774.468, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M774468.jpg'}, {'end': 914.799, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 888.103, 'weight': 5, 'content': [{'end': 894.266, 'text': "they're fast and reliable, But if you're looking to upgrade from your traditional shared hosting or something like that to managed,", 'start': 888.103, 'duration': 6.163}, {'end': 895.207, 'text': "it's definitely worth it.", 'start': 894.266, 'duration': 0.941}, {'end': 898.329, 'text': "So let's take a look at my results for the managed web hosting.", 'start': 895.607, 'duration': 2.722}, {'end': 900.275, 'text': 'First up, Kinsta.', 'start': 899.175, 'duration': 1.1}, {'end': 902.776, 'text': 'Kinsta has been around for quite some time.', 'start': 900.935, 'duration': 1.841}, {'end': 909.798, 'text': 'Their average load time was 1.34 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.99%.', 'start': 902.896, 'duration': 6.902}, {'end': 914.799, 'text': 'The only drawback with Kinsta is they are probably the most expensive hosting provider on this entire list.', 'start': 909.798, 'duration': 5.001}], 'summary': 'Kinsta: 1.34s load time, 99.99% uptime, but pricey.', 'duration': 26.696, 'max_score': 888.103, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M888103.jpg'}, {'end': 961.386, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 930.306, 'weight': 6, 'content': [{'end': 933.63, 'text': "Another reputable web hosting company that's been around for quite some time.", 'start': 930.306, 'duration': 3.324}, {'end': 939.636, 'text': 'WP Engine had an average load time of 849ms and an annual uptime of 99.99%.', 'start': 934.331, 'duration': 5.305}, {'end': 947.644, 'text': "WP Engine now offers four different plans and to be honest, I'm not really sure the differences between these hosting plans.", 'start': 939.636, 'duration': 8.008}, {'end': 951.048, 'text': 'For this specific test, I just used the managed hosting.', 'start': 948.465, 'duration': 2.583}, {'end': 954.642, 'text': 'The plans start at $25 a month and go up.', 'start': 952.401, 'duration': 2.241}, {'end': 961.386, 'text': 'The best deal would probably be the growth plan, which allows you to host up to 10 websites for around $95 a month.', 'start': 955.242, 'duration': 6.144}], 'summary': 'Wp engine offers hosting with 849ms load time, 99.99% uptime, and plans starting at $25/month, with growth plan hosting up to 10 websites for $95/month.', 'duration': 31.08, 'max_score': 930.306, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M930306.jpg'}], 'start': 695.458, 'title': 'Cloud hosting services', 'summary': 'Compares cloud hosting services from namehero, hostinger, kinsta, and wp engine, highlighting load times ranging from 770ms to 1.34s, uptime of 99.99%, and pricing starting from $2.40, also discussing customer portal, setup wizard, and plan differences.', 'chapters': [{'end': 792.852, 'start': 695.458, 'title': 'Namehero cloud hosting review', 'summary': "Discusses namehero's cloud hosting services, highlighting its impressive speed with an average website load time of 770ms and an annual uptime of 99.99%, along with exclusive promotional prices starting from $2.40 for the starter cloud plan and $6 for the turbocloud plan, allowing hosting of unlimited websites. additionally, the company's improved backend and customer portal, easy setup wizard for wordpress, and positive customer reviews contribute to its appeal.", 'duration': 97.394, 'highlights': ["NameHero's cloud hosting offers impressive speed with an average website load time of 770ms and an annual uptime of 99.99%, showcasing reliable performance.", "Exclusive promotional prices for NameHero's cloud plans start from $2.40 for the starter cloud plan and $6 for the TurboCloud plan, allowing hosting of unlimited websites, offering significant cost savings compared to competitors.", 'The company has dramatically improved their backend and customer portal, providing users with a streamlined experience for managing domains, plans, and billing information.', "NameHero's easy setup wizard for WordPress allows for quick installation, enabling users to have their website up and running in a few clicks, enhancing user experience.", "Positive customer reviews are abundant, reflecting high satisfaction with NameHero's services and further validating its appeal in the market."]}, {'end': 969.03, 'start': 793.832, 'title': 'Cloud & managed web hosting reviews', 'summary': "Reviews hostinger cloud and namehero for cloud web hosting, highlighting hostinger's 1.68s load time and 99.99% uptime, and namehero's affordability and speed. it also covers kinsta's 1.34s load time and 99.99% uptime, and wp engine's 849ms load time and unclear plan differences.", 'duration': 175.198, 'highlights': ['Hostinger Cloud had an average load time of 1.68 seconds and an average uptime of around 99.99% for 30 days, showcasing good performance for cloud web hosting.', 'NameHero offers affordable plans with great speeds and uptime, making it a recommended choice for cloud web hosting.', 'Kinsta demonstrated an average load time of 1.34 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.99%, positioning itself as a reliable option for managed web hosting.', 'WP Engine showcased an average load time of 849ms and an annual uptime of 99.99%, offering various plans with unclear differences and pricing starting at $25 a month.']}], 'duration': 273.572, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M695458.jpg', 'highlights': ["NameHero's cloud hosting offers impressive speed with an average website load time of 770ms and an annual uptime of 99.99%, showcasing reliable performance.", "Exclusive promotional prices for NameHero's cloud plans start from $2.40 for the starter cloud plan and $6 for the TurboCloud plan, allowing hosting of unlimited websites, offering significant cost savings compared to competitors.", "NameHero's easy setup wizard for WordPress allows for quick installation, enabling users to have their website up and running in a few clicks, enhancing user experience.", "Positive customer reviews are abundant, reflecting high satisfaction with NameHero's services and further validating its appeal in the market.", 'Hostinger Cloud had an average load time of 1.68 seconds and an average uptime of around 99.99% for 30 days, showcasing good performance for cloud web hosting.', 'Kinsta demonstrated an average load time of 1.34 seconds and an annual uptime of 99.99%, positioning itself as a reliable option for managed web hosting.', 'WP Engine showcased an average load time of 849ms and an annual uptime of 99.99%, offering various plans with unclear differences and pricing starting at $25 a month.']}, {'end': 1287.274, 'segs': [{'end': 1064.437, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 1024.522, 'weight': 5, 'content': [{'end': 1029.304, 'text': 'DigitalOcean had an average load time of 664 ms with zero downtime.', 'start': 1024.522, 'duration': 4.782}, {'end': 1030.444, 'text': 'Very impressive.', 'start': 1029.564, 'duration': 0.88}, {'end': 1035.227, 'text': 'We chose the DigitalOcean Premium, which essentially just uses CPUs with more speed.', 'start': 1030.925, 'duration': 4.302}, {'end': 1037.387, 'text': 'Their plans are actually pretty well priced.', 'start': 1035.767, 'duration': 1.62}, {'end': 1041.888, 'text': 'You can get hosting for as little as $12 a month, and they have plans for just about everybody.', 'start': 1037.567, 'duration': 4.321}, {'end': 1046.911, 'text': 'Their base plan is still pretty good, offering 25 gigs of storage and one terabyte of bandwidth.', 'start': 1042.409, 'duration': 4.502}, {'end': 1053.205, 'text': "You can host as many WordPress websites you want with these plans just as long as you don't exhaust the monthly resources.", 'start': 1047.83, 'duration': 5.375}, {'end': 1056.593, 'text': 'Overall, DigitalOcean is a solid pick to go with.', 'start': 1054.147, 'duration': 2.446}, {'end': 1058.794, 'text': 'Next up, Linode.', 'start': 1057.714, 'duration': 1.08}, {'end': 1064.437, 'text': 'Strangely, they performed probably the worst on my list, with an average load time of 2.96 seconds.', 'start': 1059.475, 'duration': 4.962}], 'summary': 'Digitalocean had an average load time of 664 ms with zero downtime and offers hosting for as little as $12 a month. impressive plans and performance.', 'duration': 39.915, 'max_score': 1024.522, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M1024521.jpg'}, {'end': 1126.873, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 1100.809, 'weight': 6, 'content': [{'end': 1106.753, 'text': 'However, Vulture does have the advantage here because they offer 50% more storage on every plan than DigitalOcean.', 'start': 1100.809, 'duration': 5.944}, {'end': 1111.896, 'text': 'Overall, I think the pricing, the speed, the bandwidth with Vulture is just an amazing deal.', 'start': 1107.353, 'duration': 4.543}, {'end': 1114.678, 'text': 'Next up, Amazon AWS.', 'start': 1112.836, 'duration': 1.842}, {'end': 1122.831, 'text': 'Amazon AWS had an average load time of 1.46 seconds and they also had 100% uptime over the last four months.', 'start': 1115.788, 'duration': 7.043}, {'end': 1126.873, 'text': "The only drawback with Amazon is they're a lot more expensive than the other plans.", 'start': 1123.412, 'duration': 3.461}], 'summary': 'Vulture offers 50% more storage than digitalocean, while amazon aws has 100% uptime but is more expensive.', 'duration': 26.064, 'max_score': 1100.809, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M1100809.jpg'}, {'end': 1173.382, 'src': 'embed', 'start': 1145.765, 'weight': 7, 'content': [{'end': 1150.528, 'text': 'Google had an average load time of 1.58 seconds with 100% uptime as well.', 'start': 1145.765, 'duration': 4.763}, {'end': 1154.19, 'text': 'The pricing for Google Cloud has been a little bit more pricey.', 'start': 1151.188, 'duration': 3.002}, {'end': 1156.952, 'text': "Personally, I've never really been a fan of Google Cloud.", 'start': 1154.67, 'duration': 2.282}, {'end': 1160.174, 'text': 'I just feel like you can get better performance somewhere else.', 'start': 1157.872, 'duration': 2.302}, {'end': 1163.335, 'text': "The results aren't bad, so it's really all about your preference.", 'start': 1160.774, 'duration': 2.561}, {'end': 1167.538, 'text': 'Now, these are the five hosting providers that I monitored with Cloudways.', 'start': 1164.556, 'duration': 2.982}, {'end': 1173.382, 'text': 'I think all five of them are pretty good with 100% uptime, and they do vary between price and speed.', 'start': 1168.14, 'duration': 5.242}], 'summary': 'Google cloud had 1.58s load time, 100% uptime, but pricey. other providers offer good performance and pricing.', 'duration': 27.617, 'max_score': 1145.765, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M1145765.jpg'}, {'end': 1253.111, 'src': 'heatmap', 'start': 1210.817, 'weight': 0, 'content': [{'end': 1216.56, 'text': 'However, DigitalOcean was just as good, so I do think they deserve some recognition as the best runner up, because, remember,', 'start': 1210.817, 'duration': 5.743}, {'end': 1220.722, 'text': 'we are comparing milliseconds here and we would never see the speed difference with the human eye.', 'start': 1216.56, 'duration': 4.162}, {'end': 1223.363, 'text': "So let's take a look at the hosting companies I recommend.", 'start': 1221.282, 'duration': 2.081}, {'end': 1227.045, 'text': "So if you're on a very small budget, I would recommend shared hosting with Hostinger.", 'start': 1223.723, 'duration': 3.322}, {'end': 1230.707, 'text': 'If you want fast performance at a budget, I would definitely go with NameHero.', 'start': 1227.445, 'duration': 3.262}, {'end': 1233.209, 'text': "They're the ones I currently recommend on my YouTube channel.", 'start': 1230.867, 'duration': 2.342}, {'end': 1240.093, 'text': 'And if you want to go with managed hosting, I would definitely go with Cloudways, Vultr, High Frequency Plan, or even the Digital Ocean Plan.', 'start': 1233.769, 'duration': 6.324}, {'end': 1242.735, 'text': 'Those are my top picks for the best web hosting this year.', 'start': 1240.493, 'duration': 2.242}, {'end': 1246.205, 'text': 'Now I do have an exclusive discount for Cloudways as well.', 'start': 1243.223, 'duration': 2.982}, {'end': 1253.111, 'text': 'If you guys use the coupon code Daryl, you guys will save 20% off at checkout when you purchase any of their hosting packages.', 'start': 1246.225, 'duration': 6.886}], 'summary': 'Digitalocean deserves recognition as the best runner up for web hosting, with top picks including hostinger, namehero, cloudways, vultr, and high frequency plan, offering an exclusive 20% discount with the code daryl.', 'duration': 73.027, 'max_score': 1210.817, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M1210817.jpg'}], 'start': 970.154, 'title': 'Hosting provider comparison and recommendations', 'summary': 'Compares cloudways with various hosting providers, highlighting digitalocean and vultr as top choices with 100% uptime, great speed, reasonable storage, and an exclusive 20% discount. vultr is recommended as the best choice due to its great speed, uptime, and storage, followed closely by digitalocean. additionally, different hosting options are suggested for varying budget and performance needs.', 'chapters': [{'end': 1163.335, 'start': 970.154, 'title': 'Cloudways hosting provider comparison', 'summary': 'Compares the performance and pricing of hosting providers like digitalocean, linode, vulture, amazon aws, and google cloud, highlighting digitalocean and vulture as the top choices based on speed, uptime, and pricing.', 'duration': 193.181, 'highlights': ['DigitalOcean had an average load time of 664 ms with zero downtime, offering well-priced plans starting at $12 a month with 25 gigs of storage and one terabyte of bandwidth. DigitalOcean stands out with its impressive load time, affordable pricing, and generous storage and bandwidth allocation, making it a solid choice for hosting.', 'Vulture had an average load time of 704ms and an average uptime of 100%, offering identical pricing to DigitalOcean but with 50% more storage on every plan. Vulture impresses with its comparable performance to DigitalOcean, along with offering more storage on every plan, making it an attractive option in terms of pricing and resources.', 'Amazon AWS had an average load time of 1.46 seconds and 100% uptime, but is comparatively more expensive than other providers, offering the most specs but may not be suitable for everyone. Amazon AWS stands out for its high specs and solid web hosting reputation, but the higher pricing may not make it the most cost-effective option for everyone.', "Google Cloud had an average load time of 1.58 seconds with 100% uptime, but is relatively more expensive, and the performance may not justify the higher cost for some users. Google Cloud's slightly higher pricing and performance that may not stand out compared to other providers make it a less favorable choice for some users.", "Linode had the worst performance with an average load time of 2.96 seconds, but maintained a 100% uptime, offering similar plans and specs to DigitalOcean. Linode's poor performance in load time despite similar plans and specs to DigitalOcean makes it a less competitive option in this comparison."]}, {'end': 1287.274, 'start': 1164.556, 'title': 'Best web hosting providers', 'summary': 'Compares five web hosting providers with cloudways, revealing that digitalocean and vultr are the top performers with 100% uptime, great speed, reasonable storage, and an exclusive 20% discount available. vultr is recommended as the best choice due to its great speed, uptime, and storage, followed closely by digitalocean. additionally, shared hosting with hostinger, fast performance with namehero, and managed hosting with cloudways, vultr, or digitalocean are suggested for different budget and performance needs.', 'duration': 122.718, 'highlights': ['Vultr is recommended as the best web hosting provider due to its great speed, uptime, and storage, followed closely by DigitalOcean.', 'DigitalOcean and Vultr are the clear winners among the five hosting providers, offering 100% uptime, great speed, reasonable storage, and an exclusive 20% discount available.', 'An exclusive 20% discount code is available for any of the hosting plans mentioned in the video, which can be accessed through the link in the description.', 'Shared hosting with Hostinger is recommended for those on a very small budget, while fast performance at a budget is suggested with NameHero.', 'Managed hosting options with Cloudways, Vultr, High Frequency Plan, or Digital Ocean Plan are recommended for different needs, and an exclusive 20% discount for Cloudways is available using the coupon code Daryl.']}], 'duration': 317.12, 'thumbnail': 'https://coursnap.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/video-capture/PNaSC74vm9M/pics/PNaSC74vm9M970154.jpg', 'highlights': ['Vultr is recommended as the best web hosting provider due to its great speed, uptime, and storage, followed closely by DigitalOcean.', 'DigitalOcean and Vultr are the clear winners among the five hosting providers, offering 100% uptime, great speed, reasonable storage, and an exclusive 20% discount available.', 'An exclusive 20% discount code is available for any of the hosting plans mentioned in the video, which can be accessed through the link in the description.', 'Shared hosting with Hostinger is recommended for those on a very small budget, while fast performance at a budget is suggested with NameHero.', 'Managed hosting options with Cloudways, Vultr, High Frequency Plan, or Digital Ocean Plan are recommended for different needs, and an exclusive 20% discount for Cloudways is available using the coupon code Daryl.', 'DigitalOcean had an average load time of 664 ms with zero downtime, offering well-priced plans starting at $12 a month with 25 gigs of storage and one terabyte of bandwidth. DigitalOcean stands out with its impressive load time, affordable pricing, and generous storage and bandwidth allocation, making it a solid choice for hosting.', 'Vulture had an average load time of 704ms and an average uptime of 100%, offering identical pricing to DigitalOcean but with 50% more storage on every plan. Vulture impresses with its comparable performance to DigitalOcean, along with offering more storage on every plan, making it an attractive option in terms of pricing and resources.', 'Amazon AWS had an average load time of 1.46 seconds and 100% uptime, but is comparatively more expensive than other providers, offering the most specs but may not be suitable for everyone. Amazon AWS stands out for its high specs and solid web hosting reputation, but the higher pricing may not make it the most cost-effective option for everyone.', "Google Cloud had an average load time of 1.58 seconds with 100% uptime, but is relatively more expensive, and the performance may not justify the higher cost for some users. Google Cloud's slightly higher pricing and performance that may not stand out compared to other providers make it a less favorable choice for some users.", "Linode had the worst performance with an average load time of 2.96 seconds, but maintained a 100% uptime, offering similar plans and specs to DigitalOcean. Linode's poor performance in load time despite similar plans and specs to DigitalOcean makes it a less competitive option in this comparison."]}], 'highlights': ['Vultr is recommended as the best web hosting provider due to its great speed, uptime, and storage, followed closely by DigitalOcean.', 'DigitalOcean and Vultr are the clear winners among the five hosting providers, offering 100% uptime, great speed, reasonable storage, and an exclusive 20% discount available.', 'An exclusive 20% discount code is available for any of the hosting plans mentioned in the video, which can be accessed through the link in the description.', 'Shared hosting with Hostinger is recommended for those on a very small budget, while fast performance at a budget is suggested with NameHero.', 'Managed hosting options with Cloudways, Vultr, High Frequency Plan, or Digital Ocean Plan are recommended for different needs, and an exclusive 20% discount for Cloudways is available using the coupon code Daryl.', 'DigitalOcean had an average load time of 664 ms with zero downtime, offering well-priced plans starting at $12 a month with 25 gigs of storage and one terabyte of bandwidth. DigitalOcean stands out with its impressive load time, affordable pricing, and generous storage and bandwidth allocation, making it a solid choice for hosting.', 'Vulture had an average load time of 704ms and an average uptime of 100%, offering identical pricing to DigitalOcean but with 50% more storage on every plan. Vulture impresses with its comparable performance to DigitalOcean, along with offering more storage on every plan, making it an attractive option in terms of pricing and resources.', 'Amazon AWS had an average load time of 1.46 seconds and 100% uptime, but is comparatively more expensive than other providers, offering the most specs but may not be suitable for everyone. Amazon AWS stands out for its high specs and solid web hosting reputation, but the higher pricing may not make it the most cost-effective option for everyone.', "Google Cloud had an average load time of 1.58 seconds with 100% uptime, but is relatively more expensive, and the performance may not justify the higher cost for some users. Google Cloud's slightly higher pricing and performance that may not stand out compared to other providers make it a less favorable choice for some users.", "Linode had the worst performance with an average load time of 2.96 seconds, but maintained a 100% uptime, offering similar plans and specs to DigitalOcean. Linode's poor performance in load time despite similar plans and specs to DigitalOcean makes it a less competitive option in this comparison."]}